Skip to content

H

Hörner, Margaret

Full Name: Hörner, Margaret

Gender: female

Date Born: unknown

Date Died: unknown

Home Country/ies: Germany

Subject Area(s): Mannerist (Renaissance-Baroque style)


Overview

Mannerism






Citation

"Hörner, Margaret." Dictionary of Art Historians (website). https://arthistorians.info/hornerm/.


More Resources

Search for materials by & about this art historian:

Mannerism

Hotho, Heinrich Gustav

Image Credit: ArtHistoricum.net

Full Name: Hotho, Heinrich Gustav

Gender: male

Date Born: 1802

Date Died: 1873

Place Born: Berlin, Germany

Place Died: Berlin, Germany

Home Country/ies: Germany

Subject Area(s): aesthetics, art history, art theory, and philosophy

Career(s): philosophers


Overview

Esthetician and early art historian; major exponent of Hegel’s philosophy in art. Hotho studied law at the Universities of Jura and Breslau between 1820-22 before settling on philosophy at Berlin. He wrote his doctorate in 1826 on Descartes, receiving his habilitation in esthetics and art history a year later with a work on Heraklitus. He was made a professor in Berlin in 1829. Already it is clear that his interests lay in art, as his examination covered Dutch and German paintings of the 15th century. Hotho was an enthusiastic lecturer, admiring works of art so much that it seemed to his students that he was the painter himself. In 1832 Hotho applied for a position a the new Berlin Art museum, founded two years earlier by Gustav Friedrich Waagen. He was made assistant in the painting division of the Berlin Art Museum. In 1835 his first art-historical writings appeared, Vorstudien für Leben und Kunst, where he confessed a predilection for critiquing individual works of art rather than writing histories. Hotho published a commentary on the painting of the late Middle Ages German and the Netherlands, Geschichte der deutschen und niederländischen Malerei, written–unusual for German academics–in a very direct and concise language. Although a frank Hegelian account of the period, his hermeneutical method also showed an influence of Johann Joachim Winckelmann and the philosophers Friedrich Schelling (1775-1854), Karl Solger (1780-1819). He re-issued his Netherlandish volume in the 1860s, concentrating on Hubert van Eyck and leaving out the sections on aesthetics. In 1860 Hotho was promoted to director of the Print Collection at the Berlin Museum (Kupferstichkabinetts der Berliner Museen). His later writing showed a shift toward a more empirical method art history. Art historians during the early years of art history followed either an empirical method, frequently based on the study of the individual work of art, or sweeping, theoretical approaches that attempted to summarize a period of art. Hotho, Waagen and Karl Friedrich von Rumohr belonged to the former, frequently termed the “Berlin school of art history.” Hotho took pains in his writing to insist his findings were not speculative but founded on facts, a contention supported by his practical work in the museum. Hotho was a life-long Hegelian (Hegel taught at the University of Berlin from 1818 until 1831), and one of the most prominent representatives of a Hegelian view of art history. Hotho edited Hegel’s work and lecture on them after Hegel’s death. The Hegelian approach to art history rejected the contemporary notion that antiquity, the Italian Renaissance and late Middle Ages formed the important the epochs of art. Hotho’s Hegelian view favored an evolution of art motivated by spirit (Geist) and a tension with material. Hotho’s art-historical writings attempt to discern the Geist driving the painter to create, thereby (according to Hotho) enabling a full appreciation of individual works of the master. His method necessarily relies on a strong art appreciation component to construct his art history, but the philosophical construct obstructed his judgment. He disparaged contemporary art such as the Düsseldorf school and Jacob Burckhardt complained of Hotho’s exuberant writing. In this regard his writings have not held historical value as much as his fellow Berlin school historians, especially Rumohr, whose writings were rooted more on factual observation.


Selected Bibliography

[dissertation] De philosophia cartesiana. Berlin: Typis Ioannis Friderici Starckii 1826; Vorstudien für Leben und Kunst. Stuttgart: Cotta, 1835; Geschichte der deutschen und niederländischen Malerei. 2 vols. Berlin: s.n.,1842-1843; Dürer-Album: Albrecht’s Dürer Kunstart, Leben und Kunstentwicklung. Berlin: G. Schauer 1864; Die Malerschule Huberts Van Eyck: nebst deutschen Vorgängern und Zeitgenossen. Berlin: Veit & Comp., 1855-1858; Don Ramiro: Trauerspiel in drei Aufzügen. Berlin: In der Maurerschen buchhandlung, 1825; Geschichte der christlichen Malerei, in ihrem Entwicklungsgang dargestellt. Vol. 1. Stuttgart: s.n.,1867; öffentliche Vorlesungen über Gegenstände der Litteratur und Kunst, an der Königlichen Friedrich-Wilhelms universität zu Berlin gehalten. Berlin: s.n.,1842-1843; edited, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel’s Vorlesungen über die Aesthetik. Berlin : Duncker & Humblot, 1842-1843; edited, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel’s Werke. Berlin: Duncker und Humbolt, 1835-38; Vorstudien für Leben und Kunst. Stuttgart: Cotta, 1835.


Sources

Metzler Kunsthistoriker Lexikon: zweihundert Porträts deutschsprachiger Autoren aus vier Jahrhunderten. Stuttgart: Metzler, 1999, pp. 183-4; Kultermann, Udo. The History of Art History. New York: Abaris, 1993, pp. 92-3; Ziemer, Elisabeth. Heinrich Gustav Hotho, 1802-1873: ein Berliner Kunsthistorischer, Kunstkritiker und Philosoph. Berlin: D. Reimer Verlag, 1994.




Citation

"Hotho, Heinrich Gustav." Dictionary of Art Historians (website). https://arthistorians.info/hothoh/.


More Resources

Search for materials by & about this art historian:

Esthetician and early art historian; major exponent of Hegel’s philosophy in art. Hotho studied law at the Universities of Jura and Breslau between 1820-22 before settling on philosophy at Berlin. He wrote his doctorate in 1826 on Descartes, recei

Houbraken, Arnold

Image Credit: Wikipedia

Full Name: Houbraken, Arnold

Gender: male

Date Born: 1660

Date Died: 1719

Place Born: Dordrecht, Gemeente, South Holland, Netherlands

Place Died: Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands

Home Country/ies: Netherlands

Career(s): art critics, artists (visual artists), draftsmen (artists), engravers (printmakers), illustrators, and painters (artists)


Overview

Art writer, painter, draughtsman, engraver, book illustrator. At the age of nine, Houbraken became an assistant in the shop of the Dordrecht merchant in twine, Johannes de Haan. His patron, being himself trained in painting by Nicolaes Maes (1634-1693), gave the young boy the opportunity to copy drawings and prints. In 1672, Houbraken began his apprenticeship as a painter, first for a short time as a pupil of the landscape painter Willem van Drielenburch (c. 1625-after 1677). In 673-1674, he spent nine months in the studio of the portraitist Jacobus Levecq (1634-1675). Eventually, between 1674 and 1678, he worked in the studio of his master, Samuel van Hoogstraten (1627-1678), who taught him classicist art theory and who at that time was writing his Inleyding tot de hooge schoole der schilderkonst (Introduction to the Advanced School of Painting, 1678). In 1678, Houbraken became a member of the Dordrecht Guild of St. Luke. As a professional painter, he also had a broad interest in antiquities and in literature related to art, theater, religion, and philosophy. He regularly worked as book illustrator. In 1685, he married Sara, daughter of the surgeon Jabob Sasbout Souburg. In 1700, he published his first book, with etchings of emblems and descriptions: Tooneel van sinnebeelden (Stage of Emblems). The prints were meant to serve as models for artists. Houbraken found most of his subject matter in the Iconologia of Cesare Ripa, translated into Dutch in 1644. Around 1709-1710, he moved with his wife and ten children to the Prinsengracht in Amsterdam. His daughter Antonyna (1686-1736) dedicated herself to drawing, and his son Jacob (1698-1780) became a renowned engraver. In 1714, Houbraken completed an emblem book, coauthored with Gezine Brit who wrote the poems accompanying Houbraken’s descriptions of the emblems: Stichtelyke zinnebeelden (Edifying Emblems). Houbraken made the designs for the emblems, which he himself along with others engraved in copper. The work appeared posthumously in 1723. H.J. Horn remarks in his 2000 study The Golden Age Revisited that this text in general does not follow the mainstream Calvinistic tradition of earlier moralists in this genre, such as Jacob Cats (1577-1660). On the contrary, there is an apparent stoic wisdom in Houbraken’s edifying explications. In 1717, Houbraken began his most important project in the field of art history: a biography of around 550 Dutch and Flemish painters, including a modest number of female artists. De Groote Schouburgh der Nederlantsche Konstschilders en Schilderessen (The Great Theatre of Netherlandish Painters and Paintresses), published in 1718-1721, was meant as a sequel to the 1604 Schilder-Boeck of Karel Van Mander The first volume begins in 1466, and the third volume ends with painters born until 1659. Houbraken intended to write a fourth volume, but he died untimely in 1719. The third volume was posthumously published by his widow in 1721. Houbraken, who lamented the decline of painting in his days, wrote that it was his intention to keep alive the memory of the artists of the glorious seventeenth century, and to encourage apprentices to imitate their excellence. His most important source was the 1675-1679 Teutsche Academie (German Academy) of Joachim von Sandrart. Houbraken’s son Jacob engraved most of the painter portraits, after his father’s designs. The lives of the painters are full of anecdotes, and interwoven with poetry and theoretical digressions, which reveal Houbraken’s classicist views of the art of painting. He regularly quoted poems from the work of Andries Pels (1631-1681), Gebruik én misbruik des toneels (The Use and Abuse of the Stage, 1681), intending to apply the rules for playwrights to the art of painting. De Groote Schouburgh gained great acclaim in the later eighteenth century. Houbraken’s first biographer was Johan Van Gool (1685-1763), who continued Houbraken’s work with his 1750-1751 De Nieuwe Schouburg der Nederlantsche Kunstschilders en Schilderessen (The New Theatre of Netherlandish Painters and Paintresses). The popularity of Houbraken’s work however declined in the following century, due to a strong disapproval of the content of some anecdotes. The stories on the great Dutch masters Jan Steen and Rembrandt in particular were seen as dubious fiction by Éduard Ernst Kolloff and even slander. From the end of the nineteenth century onwards, the art historical reliability and significance of De Groote Schouburgh were the subject of scholarly discussion by a number of art historians. An incomplete German translation by Alfred Wolfgang von Wurzbach appeared in 1880. The critical 1893 study of Cornelis Hofstede de Groot on Houbraken’s sources paved the way for a better understanding and rehabilitation of De Groote Schouburgh. The art historian Wilhelm Fraenger won a 1913 prize early in his university career on the subject of Houbraken’s art theory. Between 1943 and 1953, P. T. A. Swillens published a modern Dutch edition, with indexes and additional short biographies of the painters. Houbraken’s classicist viewpoint became an important issue in the reception of De Groote Schouburgh. J. A. Emmens, in his study Rembrandt en de regels van de kunst, saw Houbraken as a dogmatic classicist, whose main goal it was to promote his classicist theories on art. Bart Cornelis, however, rejected this criticism in his 1995 article “A Reassessment of Arnold Houbraken’s Groote schouburgh”, pointing to Houbraken’s own statement on the aim of his book. Hendrik Horn, in his above-mentioned study, tried “to hone in on the hearths of controversy like a heat-seeking missile”. A particular aspect of Horn’s interpretive study is his portrayal of the man behind the stage, the creator of De Groote Schouburgh, as a classicist artist with a broad education and a distinct philosophical attitude to the human condition of life. His connoisseurship and iconographic knowledge qualify him as an early art historian.


Selected Bibliography

[for a complete list, see] Hendrik J. Horn, The Golden Age Revisited. 2, p. 898; Tooneel van sinnebeelden, geopent tot dienst van schilders, beelthouders etc. 3 vols. Dordrecht: Niclaes de Vries, 1700; Stichtelyke zinnebeelden; Gepast op deugden en ondeugden, in LVII tafereelen. En verrykt met de bygedichten van Juffr. Gezine Brit. Amsterdam: Willem Barents, 1723; Amsterdam: Isaak Tirion, 1729; De Groote Schouburgh der Nederlantsche Konstschilders en Schilderessen. Waar van ‘er veele met hunne beeltenissen ten Toneel verschynen, en hun levensgedrag en Konstwerken beschreven worden: zynde een vervolg op het Schilderboek van K. v. Mander. 3 vols. Amsterdam, 1718-1721; 2nd edition, The Hague: J. Swart, C. Boucquet, and M. Gaillard, 1753; facsimile edition, Amsterdam: B.M. Israël, 1976.


Sources

Van Gool, Johan. De Nieuwe Schouburg der Nederlantsche Kunstschilders en Schilderessen. 2 vols. The Hague: published by the author, 1750-1751; Wurzbach, Alfred von. Arnold Houbraken’s Grosse Schouburgh der Niederländischen Maler und Malerinnen. Vienna: Wilhelm Braumüller, 1880; Hofstede de Groot, Cornelis. Arnold Houbraken und seine “Groote Schouburgh” kritisch beleuchtet. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1893; Hofstede de Groot, Cornelis “Houbraken, Arnold.” Allgemeines Lexikon der Bildenden Künstler von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart. 17, Leipzig: E.A. Seemann, 1924, pp. 554-555; Swillens, Pieter T.A. De Groote Schouburgh der Nederlantsche Konstschilders en Schilderessen door Arn. Houbraken. 3 vols. Maastricht: Leiter-Nypels, 1943-1953; Emmens, Jan Ameling. Rembrandt en de regels van de Kunst. Utrecht: Haentjens Dekker & Gumbert, 1968; Cornelis, Bart. “A Reassesment of Arnold Houbraken’s Groote schouburgh” Simiolus 24 (1995): 163-180; “Enklaar, Marlies.” Dictionary of Art. 14, 1996, pp. 794-795; Horn, Hendrik J. The Golden Age Revisited: Arnold Houbraken’s Great Theatre of Netherlandish Painters and Paintresses, 2 vols. Doornspijk: Davaco Publishers, 2000.



Contributors: Monique Daniels


Citation

Monique Daniels. "Houbraken, Arnold." Dictionary of Art Historians (website). https://arthistorians.info/houbrakena/.


More Resources

Search for materials by & about this art historian:

Art writer, painter, draughtsman, engraver, book illustrator. At the age of nine, Houbraken became an assistant in the shop of the Dordrecht merchant in twine, Johannes de Haan. His patron, being himself trained in painting by Nicolaes Maes (1634-

House, John

Image Credit: The Guardian

Full Name: House, John

Other Names:

  • John House

Gender: male

Date Born: 19 April 1945

Date Died: 07 February 2012

Place Born: Oxford, Oxfordshire, England, England, UK

Home Country/ies: United Kingdom

Subject Area(s): French (culture or style) and nineteenth century (dates CE)

Career(s): educators


Overview

Courtauld Institute 19th-century French art scholar. House was born to [Arthur] Humphry House (1908-1955), an Oxford scholar of Dickens and Gerard Manley Hopkins, and Madeline Church (House). House was raised under the stern influence of his Oxford don father until his father died when House was 10. The younger House graduated from Westminster School and entered New College, Oxford, majoring in Classics and achieving a First in the exams there. House married Jill Turner in 1968. He entered the Courtauld Institute of Art for a master’s degree, granted in 1969 and immediately became a lecturer at the School of Fine Arts and Music at the nascent University of East Anglia the same year. House used the opportunity of teaching at a relatively newly founded university, and encouraged by Department chair Peter Erik Lasko, to developed innovative teaching methods and greater student classroom participation. His career as a curator began in 1974 with the exhibition Impressionism at the Royal Academy. He pursued his Ph.D. at the Courtauld Institute, writing his 1976 dissertation on Monet. After its completion he moved to teach at University College, London. His second exhibition at the Royal Academy, a post-Impressionist show, was launched in 1979. Still only four years after his doctoral completion, House was appointed a lecturer at the Courtauld in 1980 and shortly thereafter, reader. At the same time House was the principal curator for the first major Renoir retrospective held at the Hayward gallery in 1985, a show that extended to the Grand Palais and Boston. He revised his dissertation into the book Monet: Nature into Art in 1986. House lectured as Slade Professor at the University of Oxford in 1987. He curated an exhibition reassembling the works from Samuel Courtauld’s collection, the institute’s founder, in 1994 issuing the catalog Impressionism for England: Samuel Courtauld as Patron and Collector. Appointments as a chair came in 1995 and then deputy director of the Courtauld. In 2002, he was named the Walter H. Annenberg professor. House mounted another exhibition at the Hayward ten years later, Landscapes of France, controversial because it featured academic painting of the Salon works along side the Impressionists. His final book, Impressionism: Paint and Politics, appeared in 2004. The same year he held a curatorial research fellowship at the Clark Art Institute, Williamstown, MA, 2007 show at the Royal Academy, “Impressionists by the Sea,” viewed the paintings as reflecting social change as much as highlighting the hallmark subject matter of the movement. He studied as Samuel H. Kress Professor at the Centre for Advanced Study in the Visual Arts, Washgington, D. C., for the 2008-2009 year. House’s catalog for the Royal Academy’s 1999 exhibition Monet in the 20th Century. He divorced in 2009, living his final years with a partner, Nancy Marshall and retiring from the Courtauld in 2010. House was at work on the Renoir permanent-holdings catalog for the Barnes Foundation, PA, which he had come to know intimately from his research with the Courtauld Collection, when he suffered a heart attack at age 66 from which he succumbed. As a scholar of Impressionism, House employed a traditional close reading of paint surfaces, pictorial decisions and painterly strategies (Times). Later he added a focus on the social and cultural upheavals accompanying art, particularly that of the industrialization in late 19th-century France. Though publishing during the time of the New Art History and feminism, House resisted applying these conventional theories to his work. His revisionist view of Monet’s late water lily paintings denied the modernist dictum of proto-abstract expressionism, arguing instead that they fit better into the panoramic art genre of the period in which they were painted.


Selected Bibliography

[dissertation:] Claude Monet: his Aims and Methods, c.1877-1895. Courtauld Institute of Art, 1976; Monet: Nature into Art. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1986; Impressionism for England: Samuel Courtauld as Patron and Collector. London: Courtauld Institute Galleries, 1994; Impressions of France : Monet, Renoir, Pissarro, and their Rivals Boston: Museum of Fine Arts, 1995; Impressionism: Paint and Politics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004; Impressionists by the Sea. London: Royal Academy of Arts/Harry N. Abrams, 2007.


Sources

[obituaries:] Darracott-Cankovic, Chloe. “John House, 1945-2012.” Times Higher Education (online) March22, 2012, www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=419389; Daily Telegraph (London). March 2, 2012 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/culture-obituaries/art-obituaries/9119656/Professor-John-House; “Professor John House: Authority on Impressionism Admired for his Rigorous Scholarship and his Challenging, Inspiring Teaching.” Times (London) February 29, 2012, p. 46; Masters, Christopher. “John House: International Expert on Impressionism who became a Professor at the Courtauld Institute.” Guardian (London) February 15, 2012 p. 41



Contributors: Lee Sorensen


Citation

Lee Sorensen. "House, John." Dictionary of Art Historians (website). https://arthistorians.info/housej/.


More Resources

Search for materials by & about this art historian:

Courtauld Institute 19th-century French art scholar. House was born to [Arthur] Humphry House (1908-1955), an Oxford scholar of Dickens and Gerard Manley Hopkins, and Madeline Church (House). House was raised under the stern influence of his Oxfor

Hoving, Thomas

Image Credit: Fiind a Grave

Full Name: Hoving, Thomas

Other Names:

  • Thomas Pearsall Field Hoving

Gender: male

Date Born: 15 January 1931

Date Died: 10 December 2009

Place Born: New York, NY, USA

Place Died: New York, NY, USA

Home Country/ies: United States

Institution(s): Metropolitan Museum of Art and New York Parks and Recreation Department


Overview

Controversial director of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, 1967-1977. Hoving was born to a Swedish immigrant father Walter Hoving (1897-1989), a department store magnate, President of Bonwit Teller and later CEO of Tiffany’s. His mother was Mary Osgood Field (Hoving) (d. 1954), a descendant of the first Postmaster General of the United States, Samuel Osgood (1747-1813). His early childhood was spent in Lake Forest, Illinois until his parents divorced (age five), when he and his mother moved to New York. His youth was turbulent. Hoving attended various preparatory schools, Buckley, Eaglebrook, Exeter and Hotchkiss, before graduating summa cum laude from Princeton University in 1953. He met and married a Vassar student Nancy Bell during his college years. After discharge from the Marine Corps in 1955, he attended Princeton graduate school in art history (on a scholarship because his father declined to pay for art studies). As a graduate student he gave a lecture in 1959 at the Frick Collection, part of Princeton’s annual graduate student symposium, where James Rorimer, Director of the Metropolitan Museum of Art was greatly impressed. Hoving’s father introduced his son to Rorimer, also a medievalist, who offered him a job as a curatorial assistant at The Cloisters, a branch of the Metropolitan Rorimer helped build. Hoving completed his dissertation in 1960, written under Kurt Weitzmann with a topic on the Ada School ivories, part of the first major scriptorium of the Carolingian Renaissance. Rorimer took Hoving on buying trips in Europe and taught him much about the trade. Hoving honed his connoisseurship skills from Erich Steingräber, Director of the Germanic Museum in Nuremberg, when the scholar spent half a year with the Met’s collections.

Hoving’s doggedness as a curator resulted in spectacular finds, such as the Romanesque doorway in the Fuentidueña Chapel of The Cloisters which he tracked down to an abandoned lot in Nice, France. He was also responsible for acquiring in 1963 one of the Met’s most treasured medieval pieces, a late twelfth-century English ivory cross believed at the time to have come from Bury St. Edmunds. The other possible contender, the British Museum’s Rupert Leo Scott Bruce-Mitford, refused to bid on the cross because of its poor provenance. In 1965 Hoving left the Museum to accept an offer by Mayor John Lindsay (1921-2000) to be Commissioner of Parks. As Commissioner, Hoving changed the operation of the NYC Parks, for example, creating the building-sized banners for the public to paint in Central Park, known famously as Hoving’s “Happenings.” When Rorimer died unexpectedly of a heart attack the following year, 1966, Hoving was appointed director of the Met, largely because of his skill at the Parks System of integrating the public into its projects. By 1970 he had developed a master plan for the Museum (the first big building project since 1926), calling for five new wings and an increase in gallery space by one third.

Hoving was always controversial in the position as director. In 1972, he authorized the sale of important Impressionist and post-Impressionist paintings and old masters (some were unrecognized major works by important painters, such as Guido Reni and Artemisia Gentileschi), and modern pictures to raise money for new acquisitions. Scholars such as John Rewald, the dealer Eugene V. Thaw (1927-2018), and New York Times critic John Canaday raised a public outcry. Hoving saw his mission to change the museum to make art more accessible to the public. But Hoving’s theatrics and what the academic world perceived as his lack of integrity were distancing the Museum from the very scholars they sought to attract. To address this, Hoving hired former Victoria and Albert Museum director John Pope-Hennessy for the position of “Consultative Chairman” to the Department of European Painting in 1977. The move was considered brilliant. Pope-Hennessy was essentially Hoving’s opposite, a strong connoisseur-style historian with little tolerance for mediocrity. He also harbored a surprising regard for Hoving. Hoving negotiated the famous “King Tut” show for the Met, traveling to other museums in the U.S.. Sensing rising disapproval of his disregard of Museum procedures, Hoving announced a new private center to be built within the Metropolitan Museum with Annenberg funds, in 1977, with himself as director. He stepped down and was succeeded by deputy director Philippe de Montebello, who oversaw the stupendous response of the Tut show Hoving had instituted. Rising controversy followed the Annenberg plan and it was eventually scrapped. Hoving worked as an arts correspondent for ABC television’s “20/20” (through 1984) and editor of Connoisseur Magazine beginning in 1981. He changed the respected art journal to include gossipy pieces and vendettas against art museums, particularly the Getty. The journal folded in 1991.

Hoving also wrote a spate of one-sided tell-all-style books of his years at the Metropolitan. The books spent many weeks on The New York Times “Best Seller” list. King of the Confessors (1981) tells the history and acquisition of the so-called Bury St. Edmund’s cross, failing to mention in typical Hoving style, that the work was referred to him by the (Boston) Museum of Fine Art’s Hanns Swarzenski. In 1993, after several failures with fiction, he regained the best seller with his publication Making the Mummies Dance: Inside the Metropolitan Museum of Arta title derived from a comment of Lindsay’s to him, “you’ll make the mummies dance.” Hoving wrote a catalog intending it to accompany an Andrew Wyeth retrospective in 1995 at the Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art in Kansas City. He matched Wyeth’s comments to the over four thousand pieces Wyeth had painted for the 1995 Kansas City exhibition, Andrew Wyeth: Autobiography. Though the book did disappointingly in sales, it marked the first time an art historian ever interviewed Wyeth. In 1996 Hoving returned to the block-buster tell-all with False Impressions: The Hunt for the Big-Time Art Fakes. He died at his Manhattan home at age seventy-eight.

Hoving’s genuine art-historical erudition was overshadowed by a personal egotism, but also a genuine populism. Infatuated with publicity and the power it brings, he ultimately overplayed his authority at the Metropolitan. His disregard for standard museum practice was famous. For example, he and his curator of classical art, Dietrich von Bothmer, purchased a Greek krater decorated by Euphronios in 1972 by selling a large part of the Department’s coin collection, despite the krater’s murky provenance and high price. Years later, in 1993, Hoving admitted that at the time and krater was repatriated, the provenance was known to have been wrong. He mockingly referred to the incident as the “hot pot”. Scholarly shows, such as the important “French Painting 1774-1830,” had included paintings by lesser-known artists lent by the Louvre. Hoving cut them from the show at the last minute, according to a fellow organizer, Bob Rosenblum, because they could not be promoted to the public. His memoir-style books, while rousing stories, are one-sided and at times fictitious accounts of what would have been fascinating stories of the art world by a genuine insider. In later years he became the editor of Connoisseur where he led the exposure of the Getty Museum’s unscrupulous curator Jiří K. Frel. His competitive nature toward other art museums alienated the Met from much of the American art museum world, particularly J. Carter Brown of the National Gallery of Art. However, Hoving is credited with opening the Met to the larger museum-going audience through blockbuster exhibitions (later adopted by Brown of the NGA) and remunerative sales techniques now common in most art museums.  He was often a very canny deaccessioner that resulted in remarkable exchanges benefitting the public (Cordova).


Selected Bibliography

[dissertation:] The Sources of the Ivories of the Ada School. Princeton University, 1960; and von Bothmer, Dietrich. The Chase, the Capture: Collecting at the Metropolitan. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1975; The Search for Tutankhamun: the Untold Story of Adventure and Intrigue Surrounding the Greatest Modern Archeological Find. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1978; King of the Confessors. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1981; Making the Mummies Dance. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1993; False Impressions: the Hunt for Big-Time Art Fakes. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996; Art for Dummies. Foster City, CA: IDG Books Worldwide, 1999; The Art of Dan Namingha. New York: Harry N. Abrams, 2000.


Sources

  • McPhee, John A. A Roomful of Hovings and Other Profiles. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1969;
  • Glueck, Grace.  “Met’s New Annenberg Center Stirs Controversy.”  New York Times February. 27, 1977;
  • Hess, John L. The Grand Acquisitors. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1974;
  • King of the Confessors. New York: Simon and Schuster,1981;
  • Richardson, John. “The Mantle of Munchhausen,” New York Review of Books, (January 21, 1982): 16ff.
  • Making the Mummies Dance. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1993;
  • [relationship of Hoving to Pope-Hennessey] Christiansen, Keith. “John Pope-Hennessey (1913-94).” The Burlington Magazine 137, no. 1102 (January 1995): 36;
  • Cordova, Ruben. “Deaccessioning at the Met: From Scandal to Plein-Air Bonanza to Collection ‘Care’.” Glasstire December 14, 2021,https://glasstire.com/2021/12/14/deaccessioning-at-the-met-from-scandal-to-plein-air-bonanza-to-collection-care/

[obituaries and appreciations:]

  • Kennedy, Randy. “Thomas Hoving, Who Shook Up The Met as Its Director, Dies at 78.” New York Times (December 11, 2009): A1, B12;
  • Kimmelman, Michael. “A Populist Museum Chief with a Sense of Wonder.” New York Times (December 12, 2009): C1, 6.


Contributors: Lee Sorensen


Citation

Lee Sorensen. "Hoving, Thomas." Dictionary of Art Historians (website). https://arthistorians.info/hovingt/.


More Resources

Search for materials by & about this art historian:

Controversial director of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, 1967-1977. Hoving was born to a Swedish immigrant father Walter Hoving (1897-1989), a department store magnate, President of Bonwit Teller and later CEO of Tiffany’s. His mother w

Hubert, Jean

Full Name: Hubert, Jean

Other Names:

  • Jean Hubert

Gender: male

Date Born: 1902

Date Died: 1994

Home Country/ies: France


Overview

Co-founder Cahiers Archeologiques with André Grabar. Hubert wrote several volumes of the Arts of Mankind series. Hubert was an archivist and conservator of antiquities in the department of Seine-et-Marne in France until 1955. He played a considerable role in the “Save French Art” campaign, fighting a long battle to have French monuments considered “minor” recognized and saved.


Selected Bibliography

L’art pré-roman. Paris: Les éditions d’art et d’histoire, 1938; and Porcher, Jean, and Volbach, Wolfgang Fritz. L’Europe des invasions. Paris: Gallimard, 1967, English, Europe of the Invasions. New York: G. Braziller, 1969; Nouveau recueil d’études d’archéologie et d’histoire, de la fin du monde antique au Moyen Age. Geneva: Droz, 1985; and Lantier, Raymond. Les origines de l’art français. Paris: G. Le Prat, 1947; and Stein, Henri. Dictionnaire topographique du département de Seine-et-Marne, comprenant les noms de lieu anciens et modernes. Paris: Impr. nationale, 1954; and Porcher, Jean, and Volbach, Wolfgang Fritz. L’Empire carolingien. Paris: Gallimard, 1968, English, The Carolingian Renaissance. Arts of Mankind 13. New York: G. Braziller, 1970, [British version translated at “Carolingian Art”].


Sources

Thirion, Jacques. Cahiers Archeologiques 43 (1995): 4-7




Citation

"Hubert, Jean." Dictionary of Art Historians (website). https://arthistorians.info/hubertj/.


More Resources

Search for materials by & about this art historian:

Co-founder Cahiers Archeologiques with André Grabar. Hubert wrote several volumes of the Arts of Mankind series. Hubert was an archivist and conservator of antiquities in the department of Seine-et-Marne in

Hübl, Albert

Full Name: Hübl, Albert

Gender: male

Date Born: 1867

Date Died: 1931

Home Country/ies: Austria

Institution(s): Schottengymnasium


Overview


Selected Bibliography

[with Wolfsgruben] Abteien Klöster in Osterreich. Vienna; Verlag V. A.


Sources

Bazin, Germain. Histoire de l’histoire de l’art; de Vasari à nos jours. Paris: Albin Michel, 1986 p. 406



Contributors: Lee Sorensen


Citation

Lee Sorensen. "Hübl, Albert." Dictionary of Art Historians (website). https://arthistorians.info/hubla/.


More Resources

Search for materials by & about this art historian:

Hübner, Julius

Image Credit: Alfine Art

Full Name: Hübner, Julius

Other Names:

  • Rudolf Julius Benno Hübner

Gender: male

Date Born: 27 January 1806

Date Died: 07 November 1882

Place Born: Oels, Silesia, Germany

Place Died: Loschwitz, Saxony, Germany

Home Country/ies: Germany

Subject Area(s): painting (visual works)

Career(s): artists (visual artists), directors (administrators), and museum directors


Overview

Artist and Director of the Dresden Gemäldegalerie during the years preceding debate over the authenticity of the Holbein Meyer Madonna. Hübner studied at the Academy School in Berlin and under Wolgang Schadow and later in Düsseldorf. After a trip to Italy and settled in Düsseldorf. In 1839 he moved to Dresden where he was named a professor in the Academy of Arts in 1841. He obtained the great gold medal for painting at Brussels in 1851. In 1871 Hübner became director of the Gemäldegalerie (Paintings Gallery). For some time, controversy had been brewing over the authenticity of two near-identical paintings by Hans Holbein, known as the Meyer Madonna, of which the Dresden museum owned one. Hübner, true to his musuem, staunchly opposed the opinion of Franz Kugler and others that the Dresden version was not the autograph one, suggesting, along with art historian Herman Grimm, that both had been my the master based on stylistic grounds. The art scholar Joseph Archer Crowe, however, proved through technical analysis of painting that the Dresden version’s binding medium of the pigment could not have been from Holbein’s era. His son was Emil Hübner, a noted classical scholar.



Sources

Kultermann, Udo. The History of Art History. New York: Abaris, 1993, pp. 146-147.




Citation

"Hübner, Julius." Dictionary of Art Historians (website). https://arthistorians.info/hubnerj/.


More Resources

Search for materials by & about this art historian:

Artist and Director of the Dresden Gemäldegalerie during the years preceding debate over the authenticity of the Holbein Meyer Madonna. Hübner studied at the Academy School in Berlin and under Wolgang Schadow and later in Düsseldorf. Afte

Homburger, Otto

Full Name: Homburger, Otto

Other Names:

  • Otto Sigmund Homburger

Gender: male

Date Born: 1885

Date Died: 1964

Place Born: Karlsruhe, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany

Place Died: Bern, Bern, Switzerland

Home Country/ies: Germany

Subject Area(s): manuscripts (documents) and Medieval (European)


Overview

Medieval manuscript scholar. Homburger attended the local Gymnasium in Karlsruhe, graduating and spending a year in volunteer military service in 1903. He studied under Adolph Goldschmidt and the medievalist paleographer Ludwig Traube (1818-1876). In 1912 he published Die Anfänge der Malschule von Winchester im X. Jahrhundert, a study between the Winchester School illuminators and their continental counterparts. He served in the military in the First World War 1914-18. Homburger continued to assist Goldschmidt with his corpus of ivory carving, Die Elfenbeinskulpturen, which was concluded in 1918. He worked as a curator and later acting director of the Baden state museum in Karlsruhe, Germany, between 1919-1927. His 1928 Art Bulletin review of English Illuminated Manuscripts by Eric G. Millar was a significant supplement to this area. Between 1930 and 1935 he served as honorary professor at the university in Marburg. In 1935 he was declared “non-Aryan” by the Nazi government, for, although protestant, he was of Jewish extraction. He left Germany for Switzerland in 1936. Homburger had an offer for an appointment at New York University, issued by Walter W. S. Cook in 1937, but it never materialized. In Switzerland he completed his analysis of the manuscript collection of the Burgerbibliothek in Bern. His careful paleogeographic and art-historical analysis made this work important. After the war, Homburger took charged of Goldschmidt’s photographic collection from his mentor’s estate, which was now part of the University library in Basle. In 1949, he and Albert Boeckler mounted one of the important exhibition for early medieval art in the twentieth century, “Kunst des frühen Mittelalters.” He was an honorary professor at the University in Bern, Switzerland. Francis Wormald called Homburger, “the scholar who first mapped out the history of late Anglo-Saxon illuminated manuscripts. Goldschmidt had already through his work on early ivory carvings seen that this was an important field of study…Homburger was interested in the connections between England and the Continent in tenth-century art and saw in the Winchester School of illumination a significant monument of the renewed relationship with the Continent after the debacle of the Danish invasions in the second half of the ninth Century.”


Selected Bibliography

Die Anfänge der Malschule von Winchester im X. Jahrhundert. Leipzig: Dieterich’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung/T. Weicher, 1912; and Hürlimann, Martin. Der Trivulzio-Kandelaber; ein Meisterwerk frühgotischer Plastik. Zürich: Atlantis Verlag, 1949; and Boeckler, Albert. Kunst des frühen Mittelalters. Bern: Berner Kunstmuseum, 1949; and Goldschmidt, Adolph, and Hübner, Paul Gustav. Die Elfenbeinskulpturen aus der Zeit der Karolingischen und Sächsischen Kaiser, VIII.-XI. Jahrhundert. 2 vols. Berlin: Deutscher Verlag für Kunstwissenschaft. 1914-1918; Die illustrierten Handschriften der Burgerbibliothek Bern; die vorkarolingischen und karolingischen Handschriften. Bern: Selbstverlag der Burgerbibliothek Bern, 1962. 0.Metzler


Sources

Wendland, Ulrike. Biographisches Handbuch deutschsprachiger Kunsthistoriker im Exil: Leben und Werk der unter dem Nationalsozialismus verfolgten und vertriebenen Wissenschaftler. Munich: Saur, 1999, vol. 1, pp. 320-323; [obituary:] Wormald, Francis. “Otto Homburger.” Burlington Magazine 106 (November 1964): 513.




Citation

"Homburger, Otto." Dictionary of Art Historians (website). https://arthistorians.info/homburgero/.


More Resources

Search for materials by & about this art historian:

Medieval manuscript scholar. Homburger attended the local Gymnasium in Karlsruhe, graduating and spending a year in volunteer military service in 1903. He studied under Adolph Goldschmidt and the medievalist paleographe

Homer, William I.

Image Credit: Wikipedia

Full Name: Homer, William I.

Other Names:

  • William I. Homer

Gender: male

Date Born: 1929

Date Died: 08 July 2012

Place Born: Merion, PA, USA

Place Died: Greenville, New Castle, DE, USA

Home Country/ies: United States

Subject Area(s): American (North American)


Overview

Americanist art historian; H. Rodney Sharp Professor and frist chair of the department of art history at the University of Delaware. Homer’s father was Austin Homer, president of the J. E. Caldwell Company, a jeweler in Philadelphia. He was raised on raised on the Main Line, PA. The younger Homer entered Princeton University in 1947, hoping to become a painter. Courses taken with art history professors Albert M. Friend, Jr., and George Rowley convinced him to study art history. He graduated magna cum laude from Princeton University in 1951. He continued for his master’s degree in fine arts at Harvard University, marrying Virginia Doris Keller in 1954 (later divorced). He worked as acting director the Princeton University art gallery (1956-1957) while completing his Ph.D. Homer’s 1961 Harvard dissertation was on Georges Seurat’s color theories. After gaining his Ph.D., he was briefly associate professor of Art & Archaeology, 1961-1964. That year he published a revised version of his dissertation as Seurat and the Science of Painting. Homer moved his research interest to Amercian art. He was appointed associate professor at Cornell University, 1964, but was called to the University of Delaware in 1966 to serve as the first chairman of UD’s Department of Art History in 1966 (though 1981). He remained at Delaware the rest of his career. While researching his book on American artists, Homer became interested in photography. This lead to his publication on Stieglitz and the American avant-garde in 1977. He was awarded the UD’s highest faculty honor, the Francis Alison Faculty Award, in 1980 followed by a 1981 Distinguished Faculty Lectureship in the College of Arts and Sciences. He published his Thomas Eakins: His Life and Art in 1992. He was named H. Rodney Sharp Professor of Art History in 1984. He married for a second time to Christine Datri Hyer in 1986, a University of Rochester gallery staff person. His book on Albert Pinkham Ryder appeared in 1989. Homer was responsible for steering a major collection of African-American art collected by Paul R. Jones of Atlanta to the University of Delaware. In 1999, he issued his Language of Contemporary Criticism Clarified. Homer retired, emeritus, in 2000. His last book, The Paris Letters of Thomas Eakins, was published through a Wyeth Foundation for American Art Publication Grant from the College Art Association. A volume of Eakins’ letters remained unfinished at the time of his death. His papers, including research on Albert Pinkham Ryder are housed at the University of Delaware Library.


Selected Bibliography

[dissertation:] Seurat’s Theories of Color and Expression: their Origins and Application. Harvard, 1961; Seurat and the Science of Painting. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press, 1964; and Organ, Violet. Robert Henri and his Circle. Ithaca: Cornell University Press 1969; Alfred Stieglitz and the American Avant-garde. Boston: New York Graphic Society, 1977; and Goodrich, Lloyd. Albert Pinkham Ryder, Painter of Dreams. New York: Abrams, 1989; Thomas Eakins: His Life and Art. New York: Abbeville Press, 1992; The Language of Contemporary Criticism Clarified. Madison, CT: Sound View Press, 1999.


Sources

“Christine Hyer Weds William Homer. ” New York Times, August 25, 1986, p. B7; “Homer’s Odyssey.” Princeton Alumni Weekly: PawPlus (website) www.princeton.edu/paw/web_exclusives/plus/plus_051006odyssey; [obituary:] “Professor William I. Homer Dies.” UDaily [University of Delaware newsletter] http://www.udel.edu/udaily/2013/jul/Homer-072412.



Contributors: Lee Sorensen


Citation

Lee Sorensen. "Homer, William I.." Dictionary of Art Historians (website). https://arthistorians.info/homerw/.


More Resources

Search for materials by & about this art historian:

Americanist art historian; H. Rodney Sharp Professor and frist chair of the department of art history at the University of Delaware. Homer’s father was Austin Homer, president of the J. E. Caldwell Company, a jeweler in Philadelphia. He was raised