Skip to content

P

Pane, Roberto

Full Name: Pane, Roberto

Other Names:

  • Roberto Pane

Gender: male

Date Born: 21 October 1897

Date Died: 29 July 1987

Place Born: Taranto, Apulia, Italy

Place Died: Sorrento, Napoli, Campania, Italy

Home Country/ies: Italy

Subject Area(s): architecture (object genre), Baroque, conservation (discipline), conservation (process), Italian (culture or style), Italian Renaissance-Baroque styles, Renaissance, and sculpture (visual works)

Career(s): art critics and conservators (people in conservation)


Overview

Critic, conservator, and historian of Italian renaissance and baroque architecture. Pane befriended several prominent philosophers and art historians of his era, including Benedetto Croce and Bernard Berenson. Pane studied at the University of Rome under Gustavo Giovannoni, teaching renaissance and baroque architecture in Naples in the 1930’s. During this time he focused study on Renaissance and Baroque architecture and artistic historiography. In 1942 he was appointed chair of the department of Architecture at the University of Naples. After the war he acted as advisor for restoration of war-damaged art and monuments for UNESCO in Paris in 1949. He published monographs on Andrea Palladino (1948), Gianlorenzo Bernini (1953). The journal Napoli nobilissima was founded by him, which covered topics on urban planning, archaeology, and conservation in Italy. In 1964, after a book on Antonio Gaudi, he wrote the Venice Charter (the International Charter for the Restoration) with fellow architect Pietro Gazzola, which was approved by the International Commission on Monuments and Sites. In the 1970’s, Pane published a work entitled Il rinascimento nell’Italia meridionale, a critical analysis of art in its cultural context based on the ideas of Carl Jung and Croce, the latter now a personal friend. He also published several essays on Filippo Brunelleschi and Michaelangelo. His research interests also included Spanish and Central American architecture and 19th-century French literature. and Pane’s methodology can most easily be examined in the attack he made on one of the most respected books in 20th-century art history, Architectural Principles in the Age of Humanism by Rudolf Wittkower, at the Eighteenth International Congress of the History of Art (Venice, 1956).


Selected Bibliography

La casa di Loreio Tiburtino e la villa di Diomede in Pompei. Rome: La Libreria dello stato, 1947; Andrea Palladio. Turin: G. Einaudi, 1948; and Franciscis, Alberto de. Mausolei romani in Campania. Naples: Edizioni scientifiche italiane, 1957; Attualità dell’ambiente antico. Florence: La nuova Italia, 1967; Il Rinascimento nell’Italia meridionale. Milan: Edizioni di Comunità, 1975.


Sources

Samek Ludovici, Sergio. Storici, teorici e critici delle arti figurative d’Italia dall 1800 al 1940. Rome; Tosi, 1946, p. 274; Wittkower, Rudolf. “Preface.” Architectural Principles in the Age of Humanism. 4th ed. London: Academy, 1974, p. v; Giavarina, Adriano Ghisetti. “Pane, Roberto.” The Dictionary of Art 24: 2-3; mentioned, Ackerman, James S. “In Memoriam: Manfredo Tafuri, 1935-1994.” The Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 53, No. 2 (June 1994): 137; [obituary] New York Times, August 8, 1987, section 1, p. 50.



Contributors: LaNitra Michele Walker and Lee Sorensen


Citation

LaNitra Michele Walker and Lee Sorensen. "Pane, Roberto." Dictionary of Art Historians (website). https://arthistorians.info/paner/.


More Resources

Search for materials by & about this art historian:

Critic, conservator, and historian of Italian renaissance and baroque architecture. Pane befriended several prominent philosophers and art historians of his era, including Benedetto Croce and Bernard Bere

Panofka, Theodor S.

Full Name: Panofka, Theodor S.

Gender: male

Date Born: 1800

Date Died: 1858

Place Born: Wrocław, Poland

Place Died: Berlin, Germany

Home Country/ies: Germany

Subject Area(s): ancient, Ancient Greek (culture or style), archaeology, ceramic ware (visual works), Classical, Greek pottery styles, iconography, pottery (visual works), and vase


Overview

Early systematic scholar Greek vases; one of the founders of the institution later to become the German Archaeological Institute (Deutsches archäologisches Institut). He was born in Breslau, Silesia, Prussia which is present-day Wroclaw, Poland. Panofka studied at the university in Berlin, pursuing classical philology, beginning in 1819. In 1823 he traveled to Rome to be part of a group of northern European scholars who studied classical ruins, calling themselves the “Hyperboreans” (Hyperboreisch-römische Gesellschaft). Among them were the painter Otto von Stackelberg (1787-1837), the art writer and collector August Kestner and the classical art historian Eduard Gerhard. In Rome, Panofka’s intellect attracted the attention of the antiquities collector, Pierre-Louis-Jean-Casimir, the duc de Blacas d’Aulps (1770-1839). Panofka remained with the duke upon his return to Paris in 1828. When the Hyperborean union transformed itself into the Instituto di Corrispondenza Archeologica in 1829, Panofka was named secretary for the members in Paris. Panofka journeyed to south Italy where he became engaged with the antiquities of the Museo Nazionale in Naples. There Panofka cataloged the vases of the museum and Gerhard the classical sculpture. Panofka returned to Paris and issued his research on Greek pottery, his Recherches sur les véritables noms des vases grecs. He moved to his native Germany by 1836 to work at the Royal museum in Berlin. His knowledge of classical vases led to an eventual appointment as curator of the vase collection. The final years in Berlin were hard for him. Growing deaf and less and less able to support himself on the wages of the museum, Panofka nevertheless published Terracotten des königlichen Museums zu Berlin in 1842. He died in Berlin at fifty-eight. Subsequent scholarship has shown Panofka to have been overly subjective on his judgment of vases. His publications were criticized by later scholars for their numerous errors. His support of intellectual societies, such as the early Instituto di Corrispondenza Archeologica, [Institut für archäologisches Korrespondenz, in German] in Rome was important for developing the present German Archaeological Institute (Deutsches archäologisches Institut) in 1871, the current intellectual organization for classical research by German scholars.


Selected Bibliography

[letters included in] Raumer, Friedrich von, editor. Antiquarische Briefe. Leipzig: F. A. Brockhaus, 1851; Terracotten des königlichen Museums zu Berlin. Berlin : G. Reimer, 1842; Die griechischen Eigennamen mit Kalos im Zusammenhang mit dem Bilderschmuck auf bemalten Gefässen. Berlin: Gedruckt in der Druckerei der König. Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1850; Recherches sur les véritables noms des vases grecs et sur leurs differens usages, d’après les auteurs et les monumens anciens. Paris: Leipsick, Debure frères [and] M. Weigel, 1829.


Sources

Archäologenbildnisse: Porträts und Kurzbiographien von Klassichen Archäologen deutscher Sprache. Reinhard Lullies, ed. Mainz am Rhein: Verlag Philipp von Zabern, 1988: 25-26. Suzanne L. Marchand. Down from Olympus: Archaeology and Philhellenism in Germany, 1750-1970. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996: 54-56; “Panofka, Theordor.” Encyclopedia of the History of Classical Archaeology. Nancy Thomson de Grummond, ed. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1996, vol. 2, pp. 846.




Citation

"Panofka, Theodor S.." Dictionary of Art Historians (website). https://arthistorians.info/panofkat/.


More Resources

Search for materials by & about this art historian:

Early systematic scholar Greek vases; one of the founders of the institution later to become the German Archaeological Institute (Deutsches archäologisches Institut). He was born in Breslau, Silesia, Prussia which is present-day Wroclaw, Poland. P

Paatz, Walter

Full Name: Paatz, Walter

Gender: male

Date Born: 1902

Date Died: 1978

Place Born: Bruges, West Flanders, Belgium

Place Died: Heidelberg, Saxony, Germany

Home Country/ies: Germany


Overview

Adolph Goldschmidt student in Berlin. August Grisebach preplaced him at Heidelberg in 1947



Sources

KMP, 46 mentioned; Metzler Kunsthistoriker Lexikon: zweihundert Porträts deutschsprachiger Autoren aus vier Jahrhunderten. Stuttgart: Metzler, 1999, pp. 289-92.




Citation

"Paatz, Walter." Dictionary of Art Historians (website). https://arthistorians.info/paatzw/.


More Resources

Search for materials by & about this art historian:

Adolph Goldschmidt student in Berlin. August Grisebach preplaced him at Heidelberg in 1947

Pach, Walter

Full Name: Pach, Walter

Gender: male

Date Born: 1883

Date Died: 1958

Place Born: New York, NY, USA

Place Died: New York, NY, USA

Home Country/ies: United States


Overview

Art author and artist. Pach attended the College of the City of New York, graduating in 1903. Pach’s father, Gotthelt Padi, and uncle were photographers during the early year of the Metropolitan Museum of Art and the family lived close to the museum. Throughout his life, Pach considered himself primarily a painter and worked hard to gain recognition in that area. He studied painting with William Merrit Chase (1849-1916) and drawing under Robert Henri (1865-1929). He traveled with Chase to Europe in the summers. There he met many of the major artists he would later write about, as well as collectors such as Leo (1872-1947) and Gertrude Stein (1874-1946). His first professional art exhibition was in 1905 at the Pennsylvania Academy [of Fine Arts]. In order to support himself in the United States, he wrote for newspapers and magazines. His first long article was “The Memoria of Velasquez,” published in Scribner’s Magazine in 1907. An article the following year on Cézanne, also published in Scribners, built a reputation for him as an analyzer of modern art. Cézanne was still not greatly appreciated at the time in the United States. Between the fall of 1910 and the beginning of 1913, Pach lived in Paris, painting at the Académie Ranson under the Nabis artists Paul Sérusier (1864-1927) and Maurice Denis (1870-1943). His European contacts made him an ideal intermediary for the Association of American Painters and Sculptors, then organizing the now famous Armory Show of 1913. Pach himself was responsible for selecting many of entries in the exhibition. He also wrote the pamphlets in the show on Odilon Redon, Marcel Duchamp, and Raymond Duchamp-Villon. After the Armory Show, he contributed art criticism to the journal The Modern School: A Monthly Magazine Devoted to Liberal Ideas in Education, a standard bearer for new art tastes. Pach’s facility with languages (he spoke Spanish, French, German, Italian and Dutch as the result of his summers in Europe) made him the ideal bridge between the continental avant garde and provincial United States. In 1916 he began one of his most popular writings on art, ironically a translation of another art historian’s work. Pach had known the French art historian Élie Faure since his days in Paris and had translated two of Faure’s works on Gauguin and Seurat in 1913. His translation and serial publication of Faure’s History of Art (1921-30) was an immediate success. The 1920’s were some of Pach’s most productive writing years. Pach returned to Paris in the summer of 1926 to conduct the first courses for Americans at the école du Louvre. Among his students were Dr. Claribel Cone (1864-1929), a Baltimore collector. Pach began advising her and other American collectors such as John Quinn (1870-1924) on the acquisition of modern art. Pach’s modernist agenda raised the ire of conservative historians and artists alike. In 1928, his book Ananias, or the False Artist appeared, attacking academic artists such as William-Adolphe Bouguereau, the portrait painter John Singer Sargent and popular artists such as Léon Bakst. Criticism from the traditional-art press was resounding, the artist Rockwell Kent writing one of the more scathing reviews. Although favorably reviewed by Roger Fry and Lewis Mumford, Pach left for Paris, perhaps in exile of Ananias‘s reception, and stayed there three years. In France, Pach researched and published a book on Ingres, which received the praise of Princeton art historian Frank Jewett Mather, Jr. Still, the experience with Ananias or perhaps the generally conservative stance of the art press resulted in Pach’s increasingly difficult personality. As money became more and more an issue for him, it was obvious that his attempts to secure a museum or academic appointment were useless. In 1938 he published his memories of artists, a book entitled Queer Thing, Painting. Neither the royalties from his publishing nor his painting was enough to generate income during the depression. With the help of Harvard art historian Paul J. Sachs he secured the temporary position of “Director General” of the Masterpieces of Art exhibition for the 1939 World’s Fair in New York. Pach’s skill at getting art loaned was again evident, especially when much of the loans from European collections had to be substituted at the last moment with the advent of World War II. After the World’s Fair assignment, Pach moved to Mexico in 1942 to live at a rate one-quarter that of the United States. During World War II he wrote The Art Museum in America, a survey of museums and their necessity for the country. It was published in 1948. Pach’s final years were devoted to running a commercial sales gallery in the B. Altman’s department store, beginning in 1952. Pach’s papers are held at the Archives of American Art. As an art historian, Pach’s work derives largely from his personal knowledge of the artists of whom he wrote. He was also influenced by the work of the modernist German art historian Julius Meier-Graefe. Pach’s 1908 article on Cézanne frames the artist within an evolutionary progression of art, a concept for modern art inspired by Meier-Graefe’s writings. This notion of modern art’s lineage is set forth most clearly in his final book, The Classical Tradition in Modern Art (1959). Pach relied on personal art intuition rather than formalist analysis, the dominant methodology at the time. Part of the objection raised by critics of Ananias was the understandable moral lecturing Pach adopted (likened by one reviewer, to that of Ruskin). Pach made use of written documents and other support evidence, for example, in his book on Ingres at a time when it was not common to do so among the popular art press.


Selected Bibliography

Translations into English by Pach: The Journal of Eugene Delacroix. New York: Covici, Friede, 1937; Faure, Elie. History of Art. 5 vols. New York: Harper & Brothers 1921-30; Leiris, Michel. The Prints of Joan Miro. New York: C. Valentin, 1947. Original Writings: Edited. Larrea, Juan. Guernica, Pablo Picasso. Introd. by Alfred H. Barr, Jr. New York: C. Valentin, 1947; Gros, Gericault, Delacroix: Loan Exhibition of Paintings and Drawings, November 21 to December 10, 1938, for the benefit of the Sauvegarde de l’art francais. New York: M. Knoedler and Company, 1938; and Lazare, Christopher; Wallis, Anne A.; Haviland, Marion; de Vries, Simonetta. Catalogue of European & American Paintings, 1500-1900. [from the exhibition] Masterpieces of Art, New York World’s Fair, May to October, 1940. New York: Art Aid Corporation, 1940; The Art Museum in America. New York: Pantheon, 1948; The Classical Tradition in Modern Art. New York: T. Yoseloff, 1959; The Masters of Modern Art. New York: Viking Press, 1929; Pierre Auguste Renoir. Library of Great Painters series. New York: H.N. Abrams, 1950; Ingres. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1939; Ananias, or the False Artist. New York: London, Harper & Brothers, 1928.


Sources

Perlman, Bennard B. American Artists, Authors, and Collectors : the Walter Pach Letters, 1906-1958. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002; Queer Thing, Painting; Forty Years in the World of Art. New York and London: Harper & Brothers, 1938 [largely his recollection of other artists]; Phillips, Sandra S. “The Art Criticism of Walter Pach.” Art Bulletin 65 no 1 (March 1983): 106-21; [obituary] Arts Magazine 33 (January 1959): 13.




Citation

"Pach, Walter." Dictionary of Art Historians (website). https://arthistorians.info/pachw/.


More Resources

Search for materials by & about this art historian:

Art author and artist. Pach attended the College of the City of New York, graduating in 1903. Pach’s father, Gotthelt Padi, and uncle were photographers during the early year of the Metropolitan Museum of Art and the family lived close to the muse

Pacheco, Francisco

Full Name: Pacheco, Francisco

Gender: male

Date Born: 1564

Date Died: 1644

Place Born: Sanlúcar de Barrameda, Cádiz, Andalusia, Spain

Place Died: Seville, Andalusia, Spain

Home Country/ies: Spain

Subject Area(s): biography (general genre), painting (visual works), and Spanish (culture or style)


Overview

Painter, wrote an early biography of several artists influential for Spain. Pacheco was born to a presumably humble Andalusian family; he was raised by uncle, also named Francisco Pacheco, a canon of the Seville Cathedral. The young man assumed his more eminent uncle’s surname. After studying under the painter Luis Fernández ( fl 1542-1581) around 1580, he achieved master painter status by1585. From his uncle, Pacheco gained an appreciation for humanist studies, especially literature, and poetry in particular. He attended the tertulias (intellectual gatherings) where clerics and other educated people exchanged ideas on art and science. He received painting commissions from the Convento de la Merced beginning in 1600, today the Museo Provincial in Seville. He visited Madrid and the Escorial where he met artists including El Greco. At his return to Seville in 1611, he took the young Diego Velázquez on as a student. Velázquez married his daughter, Juana. Francisco Zurbarán and Alonso Cano were also students of his. As an artist, Pacheco’s adherence to the then largely discarded rules of Mannerism left him an undistinguished painter (Veliz), but his strict adherence to church convention made him an ideal arbiter of artistic policy. Pacheco was appointed Veedor del Oficio de Pintores in 1616 by the municipal government of Seville. Those same religious views gained him appointments with the [Spanish] Inquisition. The Inquisition Tribunal named him Veedor de Pintura Sagrada in 1618, whereby he inspected the art work of his colleagues in Seville. The city’s financial and cultural decline led to Pacheco to seek work in Madrid in 1624, but without success. During these years, Pacheco began writing a treatise on painting. His circle of humanist friends, who included the collector Fernando Enríquez de Ribera, 3rd Duque de Alcalá (1583-1637), the poet Francisco de Rioja (1583?-1659), the antiquarian and collector Rodrigo Caro (1573-1647), the Jesuit literati Juan de Pineda (1521-1599?) and the painter poet Juan de Jaureguí (c. 1566-1641), encouraged him. Like his painting, his writing style is labored and his topics disorganized. A synthetic work, drawing from the humanist circle of Seville as well as German, Flemish and Italian theoreticians, most notably Leon Batista Alberti and Giorgio Vasari. Pacheco’s main interest in writing was to produce a Spanish-language painting manual, but in this he was beaten in publication by Vicente Carducho (1576-1638), who published his De las Excelencias de la Pintura or Diálogos de la pintura in 1633. Nearly five years after Pacheco’s death, his writings were published as Arte de la pintura, su antiguedad, y grandezas. Organized as three books and an appendix, the work addresses antiquity and significance of painting, the theories of Renaissance writers, Leonardo, Alberti, Raphael and the Córdoban painter Pablo de Céspedes, whom Pacheco personally knew. The third book discusses correct practice of painting according to Pacheco, emphasizing the study of nature and the study of master artists. Pacheco’s appendix contains a copious repertory of iconographic standards for religious painting, a doctrinaire view fitting a church as a censor. Pacheco discusses three model artists of his time, Velázquez, Rubens, and Rómulo Cincinnato. It is this serious biographical discussion that qualifies him as an early art historian. His personal knowledge of Velázquez made his biographical material on the artist an important early source for later writers, such as the 1724 El Parnaso español pintoresco laureado of Acisclo Antonio Palomino de Castro y Velasco.


Selected Bibliography

Arte de la pintura, su antiguedad, y grandezas descrivense los hombres eminentes que ha auido en ella, assi antiguos como modernos [etc.]. Seville: Simon Faxardo, 1649, [Velázquez biography translated into English in] Lives of Velázquez. London: Pallas Athene, 2006.


Sources

Bazin, Germain. Histoire de l’histoire de l’art: de Vasari à nos jours. Paris: Albin Michel, 1986, pp. 52, 56; Veliz, Zahira. “Introduction [to the Art of Painting].” Artists’ Techniques in Golden Age Spain: Six Treatises in Translation. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1986, pp. 31-33; Valdivieso, Enrique. Francisco Pacheco (1564-1644). Seville: Caja San Fernando, 1990; Fallay d’Este, Lauriane. L’art de la peinture: peinture et théorie à Séville au temps de Francisco Pacheco, 1564-1644. Paris: H. Champion, 2001; Jacobs, Michael. “Introduction.” Lives of Velázquez. London: Pallas Athene, 2006, pp. 7-16.




Citation

"Pacheco, Francisco." Dictionary of Art Historians (website). https://arthistorians.info/pachecof/.


More Resources

Search for materials by & about this art historian:

Painter, wrote an early biography of several artists influential for Spain. Pacheco was born to a presumably humble Andalusian family; he was raised by uncle, also named Francisco Pacheco, a canon of the Seville Cathedral. The young man assumed hi

Pächt, Otto

Full Name: Pächt, Otto

Other Names:

  • Otto Pächt

Gender: male

Date Born: 07 September 1902

Date Died: 17 April 1988

Place Born: Vienna, Vienna state, Austria

Place Died: Vienna, Vienna state, Austria

Home Country/ies: Austria

Subject Area(s): Medieval (European)


Overview

Medievalist of the (second) Vienna School art historian. Pächt was a native Viennese. Robert Musil (1880-1942) and Oskar Kokoschka (1886-1980) were among his friends. He attended one of the ‘Humanistisches Staatsgymnasium’ in the city and in 1920 entered university in Vienna. Unlike his colleagues and the Germanic higher education model where students moved from university to university to attend classes, Pächt remained in Vienna except for one semester in Berlin (studying with Adolph Goldschmidt) and some contact with Wilhelm Pinder in Leipzig. His principal faculty in Vienna were the major forces in the so-called second or new “Vienna School” of art history: Max Dvořák, Karl Maria Swoboda whose assistant he was, and Julius Alwin von Schlosser, the latter supervising his dissertation on medieval painting in 1925. Pächt and his colleague, Hans Sedlmayr formed the nucleus of this generation of Vienna School theorists, reinventing the methodology of Aloïs Riegl to counter the prevailing art history trend of empirical attention to ‘facts’ such as iconography and social history. Pächt edited and revised a second edition of Riegl’s Spätrömischen Kunstindustrie in 1927. Between 1926-1930 he co-edited the new serial Kritische Berichte zur kunstgeschichtlichen Literatur and in 1931 and 1933 edited the first (and only) two issues of Kunstwissenschaftliche Forschungen, the vehicle for the theories of himself and Sedlmayr. His habilitationsschrift on the fifteenth-century painter Michael Pacher, was completed under August Grisebach in Heidelberg in 1932 and published in the Forschungen. It is a sterling example of the new Vienna School’s method of discerning a structure within the work which then becomes a window to the painter’s worldview. Pächt, a Jew, had his status as a privatdozent revoked when the Nazi’s came to power in Germany in 1933 and returned to Vienna. He broke with Sedlmayr, who had joined the Nazi party. In 1935 he accompanied Musil to the anti-fascist congress in Vienna for the defense of culture. Shortly before Austria’s annexation in 1938, Pächt accepted an invitation from George Joseph Furlong, director of the National Gallery of Ireland. Between 1937-1941 he researched at the Warburg Institute. As Britain entered World War II, Pächt was interned in 1940. That same year he married British subject Jeane Michalopulo. In England, Pächt cataloged manuscripts for the Bodleian Library, Oxford, and from 1945 was appointed honorary lecturer for medieval art at Oriel College, Oxford. In 1950 was made University Lecturer, 1952 senior lecturer. He spent the academic year 1956-1957 at the Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, N. J., and subsequent years as a visiting professor at the Institute of Fine Arts, New York University, and as a Reader at Oxford. Pächt, however, never fully acclimated to the English-speaking scholarly community and never secured a permanent position in his expatriate lands. He returned to his native Vienna at the invitation of Otto Demus to be Professor at the University in 1963. From 1969 he headed the Department of Manuscripts of the Austrian national library. He was made emeritus of the university in 1972. Students he greatly influenced at Oxford included the British medievalist John Beckwith and Walter B. Cahn. In his lifetime, Pächt was little known outside the German-speaking scholarly world. His method, most clearly outlined in his Practice of Art History lectures, relied on the concept of Gestaltungsprinzip or the design principle revealing the structure of the work of art and social meaning intended by the artist. These structures could be as diverse as pictorial elements or figure/ground relationships. Pächt contrasted this view to the emphasis art historians of the medieval and renaissance art placed on iconography or patronage history. Pächt’s approach was well-suited to his topics of manuscript illumination and northern renaissance painting. He used Riegl’s notion that style is relative and subject to artistic intent. He argued that medieval art lacks the verisimilitude of either the classical period or the Renaissance largely because it intends to represent miracles of God rather than the rationality of the world. Pächt’s fight against the hegemony of iconographic studies was lifelong. His 1956 review of Panofsky’s Early Netherlandish Painting was infamous for the critique he placed at the feet of iconographers who practiced their craft with almost no resistance in the United States and England. An anti-romantic to the extreme, Pächt resisted the notion of artist as genius, even when his teachers such as Schlosser embraced it in their own writings. He criticized the work of Herbert Kühn as “impressionistic” and the methods of Max J. Friedländer. Likewise he chided what he saw as the “intuitive criticism,” of Wilhelm Fraenger and Heinrich Lützeler. Though he never forgave Sedlmayr for his participation in Nazism, he wrote toward the end of his life that Sedlmayr had contributed more to the methodology of art than anyone else in our time (Methodisches zur Kunstgeschichten Praxis). Pächt tended to be less reliant on documentary sources, placing a greater emphasis on stylistic criticism and structural analysis. Pächt’s colleagues and followers came to be referred to as the “New Viennese school.”


Selected Bibliography

[complete bibliography:] Pächt, Otto. The Practice of Art History: Reflections on Method. New York: Harvey Miller, 1999, p. 144-149; [dissertation] Das Verhältnis von Bild und Vorwurf in der mittelalterliche Entwicklung der Historiendarstellung. Vienna, 1925; [habilitation] Gestaltungsprinzipien der westlichen Malerei des 15. Jahrunderts. Heidelberg, 1932, published in abbreviated form: “Gestaltungsprinzipien der westlichen Malerei des 15. Jahrhunderts.” Kunstwissenschaftliche Forschungen 2 (1933): 75-100; “Panofsky’s ‘Early Netherlandish Painting'” Burlington Magazine 98 (1956), part I (April): 110-116, part II (August): 267-79; “Alois Riegl.” Burlington Magazine 105 (May 1963): 188-93; Methodisches zur Kunstgeschichten Praxis, ausgewählte Schriften. Munich: Prestel, 1977, translated in English as, The Practice of Art History: Reflections on Method. New York: Harvey Miller, 1999.


Sources

Schapiro, Meyer. “The New Viennese School.” Review of Kunstwissenschaftliche Forschungen II. Art Bulletin 18 no. 2 (June 1936): 258, 262-65; Kleinbauer, W. Eugene. Modern Perspectives in Western Art History: An Anthology of 20th-Century Writings on the Visual Arts. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1971, p. 56 n. 119, n. 121; Fürst, Bruno. “Ein persönliches Vorwort”: 8-11. Kunsthistorische Forschungen: Otto Pächt zu seinem 70. Geburtstags. Salzburg: Residenz Verlag, 1972. [moderate information on Pächt as part of the Vienna School. (photo). Bibliography, 13-15.]; Metzler Kunsthistoriker Lexikon: zweihundert Porträts deutschsprachiger Autoren aus vier Jahrhunderten. Stuttgart: Metzler, 1999, pp. 292-294; Wendland, Ulrike. Biographisches Handbuch deutschsprachiger Kunsthistoriker im Exil: Leben und Werk der unter dem Nationalsozialismus verfolgten und vertriebenen Wissenschaftler. Munich: Saur, 1999, vol. 2, pp. 470-78; Wood, Christopher. “Introduction.” in, Pächt, Otto. The Practice of Art History: Reflections on Method. New York: Harvey Miller, 1999, pp. 9-18; Paecht-Archiv http://www.univie.ac.at/paecht-archiv/.




Citation

"Pächt, Otto." Dictionary of Art Historians (website). https://arthistorians.info/pachto/.


More Resources

Search for materials by & about this art historian:

Medievalist of the (second) Vienna School art historian. Pächt was a native Viennese. Robert Musil (1880-1942) and Oskar Kokoschka (1886-1980) were among his friends. He attended one of the ‘Humanistisches Staatsgymnasium’ in the city and in 1920